![]() That would cause the rectangles not to overwrite part of the lines of the axes. > The output of the image would look even better if the axes were drawn AFTER the density rectangles, not before. > Claims that Mathematica also has/had this problem, and how it can be solved there (sadly, I don't know enough Mathematica to understand that solution) > What this does is plot the outline of each rectangle in addition to filling it. before we start plotting the rectangles of the image: > (this is perhaps to be expected from the note in ?fault). > but for some reason it does not seem to come after the image neither > I was going to suggest panel.last to redraw a box around the image, Xlim = range(x), ylim = range(y), col = lors(12),Īdd = FALSE, xaxs = "i", yaxs = "i", xlab, ylab, breaks, Length.out = ncol(z)), z, zlim = range(z), fault = function (x = seq(0, 1, length.out = nrow(z)), y = seq(0, 1, The only change is adding box(.) at the end, and doing the first call to plot with bty="n". I also tested my code for the change in the eps header on some linux machines (I'm using a mac), and there the grid effects were less pronounced, and my code did not help.Īnyway, here is the fault function that does seem to put the box after the image is drawn. In my R, the attached replacement for fault DOES put the axes last, and does look better. Sorry, I must have made a mistake before. Next message: R check mis-identifying Illumina data file format as executable and other thoughts.Previous message: one way to solve bad looking density plots in postscript.one way to solve bad looking density plots in postscript Michael Lachmann lachmann at One way to solve bad looking density plots in postscript
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |